I've been in the studio again. I spent a week or two -- let's call it a week and a half -- in my basement at home, putting panels together with the compound miter saw Santa brought me for Xmas. I'm learning about woodworking, which my friend Dave, who made me some lovely panels in 2007, finds adorable. "They're so cute when they're young," he says. Anyway, after carpentry comes priming followed by sanding. One of these days I'll put together a whole post on my process from start to finish so you can tell what I'm doing wrong.
The important thing, though, is that I made it back into the studio with all the new panels but the largest, which I'm saving. I think I'm going to tackle a reclining nude. Another friend of mine, Joe Bopp, says, "You might get further if you're nice to the reclining nude, instead of tackling her..." Of course he doesn't realize you're not allowed to be nice to the model. They're there to be abused. If you're too nice to them they get upset. Anyway, the important thing here is that I'm going to attempt a reclining nude, like the Venus d'Urbino, the Maja, and Olympia. Make that my stake in the ground.
But the important thing right now is that I made it back into the studio. My previous two paintings had gone badly, but the new day brought new light, and, as Franklin says, "Having a productive studio practice is the ultimate balm for the irritation caused by the iniquities of the art world." And a bad day in the studio is an iniquity indeed.
Chris Rywalt, Lounging in Bed 1, 2009, oil on panel
Chris Rywalt, Lounging in Bed 2, 2009, oil on panel
Fact is, I think both these paintings are pretty lame and I'll probably end up sanding them down. So I wasted the paint anyway.
Chris Rywalt, Sea and Sky, 2009, oil on panel
Chris Rywalt, Squiggles, 2009, oil on panel
Chris Rywalt, Bubble-Yum Girl (in progress), 2009, oil on panel
Chris Rywalt, Bubble-Yum Girl, 2009, oil on panel
Chris Rywalt, Head in Hands (in progress), 2009, oil on panel
I don't know where to begin.Technical or Inspirational?I wish I was some big wig so that I could give advice, but instead, I sit here not knowing shit."Lounging in Bed 1" turns my crank because of the atmospheric perspective. Not because of the naked person. Of course, I am jaded as my job transforms naked people into props. I am more intrigued by your brush marks, which are expanding.
Sea and Sky is a big jump up from the others. Go look at some Milton Avery landscapes. See if you can out-paint them.
The one thing I do like about those top two paintings, Steve, is the way the blurred outlines in the background look in the first one. In the photo of the painting they look truly photographic, almost like a multi-plane animation camera took the shot. In real life they're less awesome but still kind of neat.My main problem with that one is the face.Franklin, I'd agree that Sea and Sky is a big jump but I'm not sure it's a jump up. Could be a jump over. I'm not sure it's a direction I like.I went looking for some Milton Avery landscapes online and what's the first one I found in Mark Harden's Artchive? Vermont Hills, from the collection of the Rose Art Museum at Brandeis. Complete coincidence.