In honor of Franklin's posting some of his works in gouache -- and also because I got a new studio and I'm thinking, between rent and commuting I won't have enough money left over to keep painting on panels with oils so I'd better find a cheaper medium to work in for a while -- I decided to dig out my old tubes of gouache. I gave them up over a decade ago when I quit airbrushing, but I kept the paints in a box in my attic. Some of the tubes, after all, date back to when I was in high school -- some of them still have formaldehyde as an ingredient -- so I didn't want to throw them away. Most of them are still liquid; a few of them will need to be revived when the time comes. (I also found my old Paasche VL with spare needles and a few cups and tools. Nostalgia is a sickness.)
I started with red because that used to be my favorite. Then I pulled out green, which turned out to be kind of dumb, since red and green makes Christmas. But the green captivated me with its pure brightness, so I played with that by itself for a while.
Chris Rywalt, untitled, 2008, gouache on paper, 12x12 inches
Chris Rywalt, untitled, 2008, gouache on paper, 12x12 inches
Chris Rywalt, untitled, 2008, gouache on paper, 12x12 inches
I really have no idea. I don't know where the lines come from or why. I just sort of do them. And that makes me uncomfortable -- I don't understand these drawings so I can't figure out if I like them or not. I certainly like things about them: I find the curves aesthetically pleasing, I guess. I like the balance between ink and ground. And I like the way watercolor lies on paper. I like the various light and dark tones of gouache in this latest one (the Kuretake is so perfectly and consistently black I don't get that effect).
But I can't judge the drawings. My eyes just kind of slide off them. Dawn, who is my eye, who I always ask about anything I do, she says she likes the drawing and would frame it right away if we had a frame for it. But still, I'm not sure. I was working on a small one in my sketchbook, in black ink, in a restaurant, and our waitress said she thought it was very pretty, and it reminded her of plants, the way plants grow. (I left her a page with our check.)
Certainly I know what I'm doing is the antithesis of LeWitt. LeWitt's formulas allowed him to say that anyone could execute the drawing; only the idea is his. I'm saying the exact opposite with these: Anyone can follow my formula, but these lines are mine and mine alone. Only I could do them. In a way, I suppose, each drawing encodes my state of mind at the time I was working on them. Maybe an advanced enough machine could rebuild my brain by interpolating from them.
Anyway. Drawings don't have to mean anything, right? I shouldn't worry because I can't explain their existence. They just exist. Right? But I wish I could put my finger on these, I really do.